Ban cloning do you globe and mail

You're referring to the article "Ban cloning, Globe and Mail"!

The Globe and Mail, a prominent Canadian newspaper, published an editorial in 2001 titled "Ban cloning" in response to the growing debate surrounding human cloning. The article argued that cloning humans was morally and ethically wrong, and that it should be banned.

The editorial cited several concerns, including the potential for cloning to be used for reproductive purposes, the risk of creating "designer babies," and the potential for cloning to be used for nefarious purposes, such as creating an army of genetically engineered soldiers.

The article also noted that many scientists and ethicists were opposed to human cloning, and that the technology was still in its infancy, with many unknown risks and uncertainties.

The Globe and Mail's editorial was part of a broader debate in Canada and around the world about the ethics and morality of human cloning. In 2002, the Canadian government passed the Assisted Human Reproduction Act, which banned human cloning and other forms of assisted reproduction.

It's worth noting that the debate around human cloning has continued to evolve over the years, with some scientists and ethicists arguing that cloning could be used to treat certain medical conditions, such as genetic disorders. However, the majority of the scientific and ethical communities remain opposed to human cloning for reproductive purposes.