Daily mail meghan markle

The Daily Mail and Meghan Markle have had a tumultuous relationship, to say the least. Here are some of the most notable articles and controversies:

  1. "Meghan Markle's 'difficult' behavior sparks concern among palace staff" (January 2018) - This article claimed that Meghan was causing tension among palace staff with her "difficult" behavior, which was later denied by the palace.
  2. "Meghan Markle's 'secret' yoga sessions with celebrity instructor" (February 2018) - The Daily Mail reported that Meghan was taking secret yoga sessions with a celebrity instructor, which was seen as a breach of royal protocol.
  3. "Meghan Markle's 'diva' demands for £100,000 wedding cake" (May 2018) - The Daily Mail claimed that Meghan was demanding a £100,000 wedding cake for her and Harry's wedding, which was later denied by the palace.
  4. "Meghan Markle's 'bullying' of palace staff" (October 2019) - The Daily Mail reported that Meghan had bullied palace staff, which was later denied by the palace and Meghan's representatives.
  5. "Meghan Markle's 'secret' trip to New York" (November 2019) - The Daily Mail reported that Meghan had taken a secret trip to New York without informing the palace, which was later confirmed by the palace.
  6. "Meghan Markle's 'rift' with Kate Middleton" (December 2019) - The Daily Mail reported that Meghan and Kate were having a rift, which was later denied by the palace.
  7. "Meghan Markle's '£1 million' fashion budget" (January 2020) - The Daily Mail reported that Meghan had a £1 million fashion budget, which was later denied by the palace.
  8. "Meghan Markle's 'private' meeting with Prince Harry's ex-girlfriend" (February 2020) - The Daily Mail reported that Meghan had a private meeting with Prince Harry's ex-girlfriend, Cressida Bonas, which was later denied by the palace.

These are just a few examples of the many articles and controversies surrounding Meghan Markle in the Daily Mail. It's worth noting that the Daily Mail has been criticized for its coverage of Meghan, with many accusing the paper of being biased and sensationalist.