Emailers then again nyt

You're referring to the infamous "Emailers vs. The New York Times" debate!

For those who may not be familiar, the debate revolves around the differing opinions on email etiquette and communication styles between two groups: "Emailers" and "The New York Times" (specifically, the newspaper's style guide).

Emailers:

• Believe that email is a suitable medium for formal and informal communication, including business and personal correspondence.
• Often use a more casual tone and language in their emails, which may include abbreviations, emojis, and colloquialisms.
• May not always follow traditional rules of grammar, spelling, and punctuation.

The New York Times:

• Advocates for a more formal and traditional approach to written communication, including email.
• Recommends using a formal tone, avoiding abbreviations and colloquialisms, and following standard rules of grammar, spelling, and punctuation.
• Suggests that email should be used sparingly and only for important or formal communications.

The debate has sparked a lively discussion about the evolution of communication, the role of technology in shaping our writing styles, and the importance of clarity and professionalism in written communication.

While both sides have valid points, it's essential to consider the context, audience, and purpose of the communication when deciding which approach to take. Ultimately, effective communication is about being clear, concise, and respectful, regardless of the medium or style used.