How should nhs be funded daily mail

The Daily Mail's views on NHS funding are often critical of the current system and advocate for changes to improve its sustainability and efficiency. Here are some of the key points they have made:

1. Increase funding: The Daily Mail has consistently called for increased funding for the NHS, arguing that the current level of funding is insufficient to meet the demands of an aging population and the increasing cost of healthcare.
2. Free market principles: The newspaper has advocated for the introduction of free market principles in the NHS, such as allowing private companies to compete with the NHS for patients and services. This, they argue, would increase efficiency and drive down costs.
3. Insurance-based system: The Daily Mail has suggested that the NHS could be replaced with an insurance-based system, where individuals pay premiums to access healthcare services. This, they argue, would provide greater choice and flexibility for patients.
4. Private sector involvement: The newspaper has called for greater involvement of the private sector in the NHS, including the use of private hospitals and clinics to reduce waiting times and improve patient care.
5. Efficiency savings: The Daily Mail has emphasized the need for the NHS to make greater efficiency savings, such as reducing bureaucracy and waste, to free up more resources for patient care.
6. Increased use of technology: The newspaper has highlighted the potential of technology to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the NHS, such as the use of telemedicine and electronic patient records.
7. Pharmaceutical price controls: The Daily Mail has called for greater controls on pharmaceutical prices, arguing that the current system allows drug companies to charge excessive prices for medicines.
8. Increased funding for mental health: The newspaper has emphasized the need for increased funding for mental health services, which they argue are often under-resourced and under-funded.
9. Improved patient choice: The Daily Mail has advocated for greater patient choice in the NHS, including the ability to choose their own doctor and hospital.
10. Accountability and transparency: The newspaper has called for greater accountability and transparency in the NHS, including the publication of waiting times and patient outcomes data.

It's worth noting that these views are not universally accepted and are often criticized by healthcare professionals and patient advocacy groups, who argue that the NHS is a publicly-funded, publicly-provided service that should be protected and preserved.