The daily mail + wikipedia

An interesting combination!

The Daily Mail is a British tabloid newspaper known for its sensationalist and often provocative headlines, while Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia that relies on user-generated content and is known for its neutrality and accuracy.

Here are some interesting points about the intersection of The Daily Mail and Wikipedia:

  1. Wikipedia's coverage of The Daily Mail: The Daily Mail has been the subject of several Wikipedia articles, including a main article about the newspaper itself, as well as articles about its controversies and scandals.
  2. The Daily Mail's coverage of Wikipedia: The Daily Mail has also written about Wikipedia, often with a critical tone. For example, in 2013, the newspaper published an article titled "Wikipedia's dark secret: How the online encyclopedia is controlled by a cabal of liberal editors".
  3. Wikipedia's response to The Daily Mail's criticism: In response to The Daily Mail's criticism, Wikipedia's founder Jimmy Wales has defended the online encyclopedia, stating that it is a reliable source of information and that its editors work hard to ensure the accuracy and neutrality of its articles.
  4. The Daily Mail's use of Wikipedia: Despite its criticism of Wikipedia, The Daily Mail has been known to use the online encyclopedia as a source for its articles. In fact, a study by the University of California, Berkeley found that The Daily Mail was one of the top 10 sources of Wikipedia citations in the UK.
  5. Wikipedia's impact on The Daily Mail: The rise of Wikipedia has had an impact on The Daily Mail's business model. With the availability of free and accurate information online, The Daily Mail has had to adapt to changing reader habits and find new ways to attract and retain readers.

Overall, the relationship between The Daily Mail and Wikipedia is complex and multifaceted. While The Daily Mail has been critical of Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia has also been a valuable source of information for the newspaper.