The globe and mail bias
The Globe and Mail, a Canadian national newspaper, is often perceived to have a liberal or left-leaning bias in its editorial content and reporting. Here are some reasons why:
- Editorial stance: The Globe and Mail's editorial board has historically taken a progressive stance on issues such as climate change, social justice, and economic inequality. They have advocated for policies like carbon pricing, universal healthcare, and increased government spending on social programs.
- Columnists and opinion writers: The newspaper features a range of columnists and opinion writers, many of whom are known for their liberal or progressive views. Examples include Thomas Walkom, who has written critically about conservative policies, and Heather Mallick, who has been a vocal advocate for feminist and social justice causes.
- Reporting on social issues: The Globe and Mail has been criticized for its coverage of social issues, such as Indigenous affairs, poverty, and inequality. Some critics argue that the newspaper's reporting on these issues is too focused on the problems rather than the solutions, and that it perpetuates negative stereotypes about marginalized communities.
- Coverage of politics: The Globe and Mail's coverage of politics is often seen as biased towards the Liberal Party of Canada and against the Conservative Party. This is partly due to the newspaper's historical ties to the Liberal Party and its perceived sympathies with progressive causes.
- Investigative reporting: The Globe and Mail has a reputation for conducting in-depth investigative reporting on issues such as government corruption, corporate malfeasance, and environmental degradation. While this reporting is often critical of powerful interests, some critics argue that it can be overly focused on exposing scandals rather than providing balanced coverage of complex issues.
It's worth noting that the Globe and Mail is a private company and is not beholden to any particular political party or ideology. While the newspaper may have a perceived bias, it is still committed to providing accurate and unbiased reporting on the news.
Some examples of the Globe and Mail's perceived bias include:
- In 2019, the newspaper was criticized for its coverage of the SNC-Lavalin affair, which some saw as overly critical of the Conservative Party and its leader, Andrew Scheer.
- In 2018, the Globe and Mail was accused of bias in its coverage of the federal election, with some critics arguing that the newspaper's editorial board was too quick to criticize the Conservative Party and its leader, Andrew Scheer.
- In 2015, the Globe and Mail was criticized for its coverage of the Canadian oil sands, with some arguing that the newspaper's reporting was too focused on the environmental impacts of the industry and not enough on the economic benefits.
Overall, while the Globe and Mail may have a perceived bias, it is still a respected and influential newspaper in Canada, and its reporting and editorial content are widely read and followed.