University of east anglia climate emails

You're referring to the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) email controversy, also known as "Climategate." In 2009, a series of emails were stolen from the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit (CRU) and published on the internet, sparking a media frenzy and controversy over climate change research.

The emails, which were released in November 2009, appeared to show that some climate scientists were trying to suppress dissenting views, manipulate data, and hide flaws in their research. The emails were widely reported in the media, and many climate change skeptics seized on the controversy to question the validity of climate change research.

However, an independent inquiry, led by Sir Muir Russell, was established to investigate the allegations. The inquiry concluded that the emails did not show any evidence of fraud or manipulation of data, and that the scientists had acted with integrity and professionalism.

The inquiry found that some of the emails did contain "unwise" and "insensitive" comments, but these were not evidence of any wrongdoing. The inquiry also found that the CRU had been subject to "unprecedented" pressure and scrutiny, which had led to some scientists feeling "under siege."

The inquiry's report concluded that:

• There was no evidence of any deliberate manipulation of data or suppression of dissenting views.
• The CRU's temperature records were reliable and accurate.
• The scientists had acted with integrity and professionalism.
• The controversy had been fueled by a "misinformation campaign" and "misinterpretation" of the emails.

The controversy surrounding the CRU emails has largely been discredited by the scientific community, and the overwhelming consensus remains that human-caused climate change is real and a pressing concern.

Here are some key findings from the inquiry:

1. The emails did not show any evidence of fraud or manipulation of data.
2. The CRU's temperature records were reliable and accurate.
3. The scientists had acted with integrity and professionalism.
4. The controversy had been fueled by a "misinformation campaign" and "misinterpretation" of the emails.
5. The inquiry found that some of the emails did contain "unwise" and "insensitive" comments, but these were not evidence of any wrongdoing.

The University of East Anglia has also conducted its own internal investigation, which concluded that the CRU had acted with integrity and professionalism.

It's worth noting that the controversy surrounding the CRU emails has been widely criticized by the scientific community, and many experts have spoken out against the misuse of the emails to question the validity of climate change research.